M

The Decline of Action Stars and Plot Imbalance: "Kandahar"

Sat Jun 07 2025


Diving into ‘Kandahar’: A Critical Look at Gerard Butler’s Latest Action Flick

Let’s talk about the American film “Kandahar” (2023), also known as “Kandahar: Mission Escape” or “Kandahar: The Escape.”

Gerard Butler’s Action Persona

Gerard Butler has carved out a solid niche as an action star, particularly after “300.” His films often promise a thrilling, adrenaline-fueled experience. However, when geopolitical elements are injected into his movies, especially without substantial action sequences, the formula starts to falter.

“Kandahar” suffers from a severe case of predictability. It’s almost a given that Butler’s character will emerge victorious, even when the odds are stacked against him.

Production and Story

Based on a script by former military intelligence officer Mitchell LaFortune, drawing from the 2013 Snowden leaks, “Kandahar” is also notable as the second American film to be shot entirely in Saudi Arabia.

The title “Kandahar” echoes the simplicity of Butler’s previous film, “Plane.” This project marks another collaboration between Butler and director Ric Roman Waugh, known for “Angel Has Fallen” (2019) and “Greenland” (2020).

The storyline bears a resemblance to Guy Ritchie’s “The Covenant,” starring Jake Gyllenhaal, but the execution feels more muddled.

Plot Overview

Butler plays Tom Harris, a CIA black ops agent. His initial mission involves sabotaging Iran’s nuclear program by bombing a nuclear facility. We also learn about his strained relationship with his wife and daughter, stemming from his dedication to work, which led him to miss his daughter’s graduation.

Following the bombing, Tom must navigate his way to Kandahar, Afghanistan, with his Afghan translator, Mo, to reach friendly forces and escape.

Echoes of “The Covenant”

The premise of an American agent risking everything to protect a local translator feels reminiscent of “The Covenant.” These agents venture into foreign lands, create chaos, and then make sure to bring along their local allies. While the first part might ring true, the latter often feels contrived, yet filmmakers boldly portray it on screen.

“Kandahar” could be seen as a darker, less polished version of “The Covenant.” The action sequences are scaled back and lack innovation. Combined with dimly lit nighttime scenes, the film relies heavily on Butler’s star power, offering little else to captivate viewers.

Uneven Character Development

While “Kandahar” shares a similar skewed perspective with “The Covenant,” it falls short in execution. The relationship between Tom and Mo is never fully explored. Despite a few meaningful conversations, their bond lacks the depth of camaraderie, feeling more like a forced partnership between strangers.

The film also neglects Mo’s character development, resulting in an unbalanced narrative. Tom remains the central figure, overshadowing Mo even when he’s meant to appear vulnerable.

Pacing and Geopolitical Commentary

The first half of the film is bogged down by tedious espionage and dialogue, with the initial action scene arriving far too late.

After lengthy exposition, a highway chase scene finally emerges, followed by repetitive dialogue emphasizing family. The film struggles to build tension, with a brief moment of suspense during a confrontation at a local warlord’s camp quickly dissipating.

“Kandahar” attempts to highlight the diverse ethnic and religious factions within the Middle East, suggesting that Western intervention is what unifies these disparate groups.

Mo’s preachy and unconvincing speeches about the suffering caused by foreign powers like the United States feel hollow and forced.

Final Verdict

More chases ensue, with a standout sequence presented through night-vision goggles.

The climactic battle features a selfless sacrifice by a special forces member, while the mysterious motorcyclist, heavily featured earlier, is abruptly written off.

Meaningless acts of heroism, near-escape confrontations, and deus ex machina bombings leave the actors and the audience exhausted.

In conclusion:

A clunky story with watered-down action,

An awkward atmosphere filled with fatigue.