Videodrome

Videodrome

Handlung

In a dystopian near-future, the world of television has become a battleground for ratings and profitability. Max Renn, the calculating and ruthless president of a low-budget cable channel known as Cinemavision, is struggling to stay afloat in a cutthroat industry. His channel's programming is a morass of sleazy infomercials, hackneyed talk shows, and cheap sensationalism, aimed at attracting the lowest common denominator of viewers. However, Max's priorities take a drastic shift when he becomes aware of a particularly disturbing television program known as "Videodrome." Videodrome, a supposedly avant-garde and provocative TV show from behind the Iron Curtain, has been making waves in the industry with its graphic and unapologetic portrayal of torture, mutilation, and other forms of brutal punishment. Max sees an opportunity to capitalize on the program's notoriety and book a deal to rebroadcast Videodrome on his channel. His reasoning is straightforward: he believes that the show's over-the-top content will attract a large and captive audience, thereby boosting his channel's ratings and revenue. As Max becomes increasingly obsessed with Videodrome, he invites the show's charismatic host, Nicki Brand, to audition for a new talk show on Cinemavision. Nicki is everything that Max wants: a sultry, enigmatic, and talented performer with a rebellious streak. However, when Nicki goes missing after her audition, Max is thrown into a world of uncertainty and paranoia. Despite his initial skepticism, he begins to investigate the disappearance of Nicki and soon discovers that something is seriously amiss with Videodrome. As Max delves deeper into the mystery, he starts to unravel a sinister conspiracy that threatens to destroy his entire worldview. The first clue that suggests Videodrome might not be as staged as he thought comes when Max encounters a cryptic and sinister executive named Barry Convex, who seems to be involved in the production of Videodrome. Convex presents himself as a ruthless and cunning businessman with a deep understanding of the dark side of human nature. Further investigation leads Max to the home of the enigmatic and reclusive electronics mogul, Max's new acquaintance leads him to meet the enigmatic television executive, Barry Convex, only to learn that Convex is merely a frontman. He soon uncovers a more sinister figure known as Professor O'Blivion, a recluse who created Videodrome and is using it as a vehicle for psychological manipulation and social experimentation. The world of Videodrome is a twisted and nightmarish realm where the boundaries between reality and fantasy are blurred. As Max becomes more deeply embroiled with Professor O'Blivion, he begins to realize that he is trapped in a labyrinthine maze of conspiracies, deceit, and psychological games. The more Max learns about Videodrome, the more his grip on reality begins to slip. His investigation into the truth behind the show leads him into a world of mind-bending horrors and surreal experiences, where nothing is as it seems. Throughout his journey, Max is forced to confront his own moral bankruptcy and the dark depths of human nature. He grapples with the notion that the line between reality and fiction is constantly shifting and that the true horror lies not in anything he sees, but in the abyss of his own psyche. The film's exploration of the impact of violence and technology on society becomes increasingly unsettling, as Max's investigation reveals the true purpose of Videodrome: to manipulate, control, and corrupt. In the climactic final act, Max discovers that Videodrome is not just a television program, but a tool for broadcasting images that can penetrate the viewer's psyche and manipulate their deepest fears and desires. The ultimate goal of Professor O'Blivion is to create a new kind of viewer, one who is capable of withstanding the most extreme forms of psychological and physical brutality. As the curtain closes on the world of Videodrome, Max is left shattered and broken, forced to confront the abyss that lies within himself. The film's ending is intentionally ambiguous, leaving the viewer to ponder the extent of Max's sanity and the true nature of Videodrome. Is it a product of a sick and disturbed mind, or a genuine attempt to explore the darkest recesses of human consciousness? Whatever the truth may be, Videodrome remains a thought-provoking and unsettling work of science fiction, a cautionary tale that warns of the dangers of unchecked technological advancement and the corrupting influence of power.

Videodrome screenshot 1
Videodrome screenshot 2
Videodrome screenshot 3

Kritiken

A

Astrid

The final scene should have burst through the screen, splattering viscera all over my face. Thankfully, it didn't, because I was watching it on a computer, not a TV. False alarm.

Antworten
6/20/2025, 2:17:45 PM
A

Aurora

1. To manufacture images, to sell images, and to ultimately become part of the image itself. David Cronenberg's radical exploration of the videotape culture prevalent in the 80s, and the violence and desire inherent in the medium itself. 2. Sex, violence, S&M, the bizarre, pleasure, death – the film portrays the intrusion of images on individuals almost like a cult's proselytization. "Licking the screen," a pulsating television, videotapes – the allure of images; the body opened up by fantasy, the "gun + human" fusion – the invasion of images. The screen constructs fantasy, fantasy is desire, people indulge in desire, and then become part of that desire. (It makes you think of Sadako crawling out of the TV, and the image...)

Antworten
6/18/2025, 1:19:45 AM
C

Camille

The ideas and perspectives are truly ahead of their time; the core argument being that visual media, mass entertainment, manipulates human consciousness and even life and death. However, the film's special effects and plot development are excessively bizarre, leading to a disconnect between the concepts and the narrative structure. The latter half of the film is entirely self-indulgent, offering nothing beyond sensationalism. Today, mass media has long become a tool for manipulating public opinion, from ideology to advertising endorsements. Humanity has been conditioned into slaves of 4A advertising agencies and "official fact-checkers," which is far more efficient than whips and guns.

Antworten
6/17/2025, 1:28:30 PM
S

Sophia

[B] Interesting ideas, though the didacticism is a bit heavy-handed. Cronenberg's films can sometimes be emetic, not just because of the visual grossness, but because something about the way they're filmed just feels...wrong.

Antworten
6/16/2025, 10:21:23 AM
P

Paisley

Cronenberg at his most bizarre and terrifying. 1. A prescient reflection on violent imagery, foreshadowing \[Tetsuo: The Iron Man] and \[Tesis]. 2. Visceral and impactful gore effects, exploring human mutation and the corporealization of the image: the "hand" gun + the vaginal slit in the abdomen + the TV set quivering with orgasmic moans. 3. The inextricable blurring of reality and illusion underscores the manipulative power of mass media, calling to mind McLuhan. 4. James Woods's character name, "Max," evokes \[Once Upon a Time in America]. 5. A surging current of S&M desire, tinged with a fetishistic Orientalism. (9.0/10)

Antworten
6/11/2025, 2:15:23 PM

Empfehlungen