Heretic

Plot
In the foreboding and sinister world of 'Heretic,' two young and ambitious missionaries, Jonathan and Emma, are driven by a zeal to spread the teachings of their faith to the masses. They see the devout, pious, and the righteous as worthy targets of their philanthropic endeavor, but little do they know, their relentless quest for righteousness is about to take an ominous turn. Jonathan, ever so willing to please, and Emma, driven by a sense of duty and conviction, stumble upon a predominantly rundown and secluded neighborhood that resonates with desperation. Their incessant knocking on the door of an oppressive, dingy, old house inadvertently marks the beginning of an unforgettable episode in their faith's trajectory. On the other end of the worn-out door, lives a ruthless and unsettling figure by the name of David Reed. Reed is a connoisseur of the game, where only the most cunning and skilled emerge victorious. Behind the cold contours of his features lies a clever and calculating individual, reveling in chaos and spreading terror. Reed, having weathered numerous encounters with two young zealots, savors the morbid fascination his game of cat-and-mouse tends to evoke from fresh arrivals. And so, the moment Jonathan and Emma shook his door, began to seal their fate. Reed unleashes his sharp wit, keen observation, and skillful psychological interrogation upon the two naive young missionaries. With calculated intensity, he scrutinizes their every action, all the while attempting to dismantle the pillar of their unwavering faith, i.e., their trust in their higher power. Through complex verbal cues and unexpected silences, Reed puts them on an unsettling seesaw. As the lines between sanity and destruction blur, Jonathan and Emma are exposed to a wicked world of psychological dread and mortal danger, that threatens to leave them decimated. But the greatest challenge to Jonathan and Emma's will to stay true to their faith lies not in David Reed's physical ferocity or in the graphic brutality that has the potential to unfold through this game. It lies in exposing vulnerabilities that lay deep within themselves. Jonathan, guided by an unyielding adherence to his faith, refuses to compromise and finds solace in divine retribution, whereas Emma, taken by an unseen sense of fear and inexplicable empathy with Reed, finds herself drawn closer to the darkness at the heart of her tormentor. Through an increasingly fragile emotional connection, Emma becomes increasingly worn down and susceptible to the venomous and insidious wit employed by Reed. As Jonathan undergoes an almost impenetrable siege of mental anguish and relentless questioning from Reed, Emerson finds herself slowly slipping towards the despair that has governed each of Reed's previous pursuits of spiritual opponents. Lost in an ephemeral haze, ever-receding glimpses of the faith she once held with conviction prompt questions about her purpose. Subtly, David Reed, however, stumbles upon the ultimate game-changer that sets in motion a dramatic climax and tests the limits of the young missionary's faith. Their unyielding pilgrimage across the wasteland of spiritual darkness is ultimately tested by Reed's devastating assertion that no sign of divine intervention can assuage their deep vulnerabilities in the bleak, cold and unforgiving world. Heretic ultimately unfolds as an existential struggle to comprehend whether every true believer is perpetually faced with the insidious temptation to submit to an objective truth. It presents itself as an absorbing, thought-provoking mystery, where, unbeknownst to Jonathan and Emma, their faith's durability and sturdiness is subjected to the pitiless scrutiny of their mysterious tormentor and the unyielding test of courage.
Reviews
Elijah
Okay, here's the translated review, aiming for a natural English flow and capturing the essence of the original meaning within the context of the film "Heretic": "Now that's what I call levels upon levels - a house within a house, a father above a father. This only means I need to work even harder to rise above."
Amara
The film is impeccable for its first two-thirds, with discussions about the origin, development, and significance of religion being timelessly relevant. However, the challenge lies in its ultimate conclusion. The film concludes on the theme of control, opting for a more audience-friendly and safer middle ground. But in doing so, it sacrifices the potential for transcendence. If Hugh Grant's character had been a manifestation of the devil, using endless questions and methods to dissolve faith, I believe this film would have truly taken off.
Piper
No cheap jump scares insulting the audience's intelligence here, just a pure, breathtaking battle and slaughter of wits alone, which is enough to make it the horror film of the year. Walking a high wire between religion and anti-religion, it manipulates faith with dense dialogue, and ultimately, with sobering clarity, points directly to the essence of religion – control. Yet, it leaves an escape hatch open with a Zhuang Zhou dreaming of a butterfly-esque ambiguity. A24 has such a shrewd eye for horror films...
Nina
The Monopoly scene was hilarious, and the plot really took off after that. The only problem with this movie is that the aesthetics are a bit dated. The concept and actors were all on point, and the character arcs and anti-climax were well-written, but the director's use of visual language and the formulaic writing at the beginning felt a little old-fashioned. This film could have been ten minutes shorter. Hugh Grant has truly become one of the best actors of our time. I almost joked after the screening that the character was just a professor who went crazy for quizzes, but luckily I didn't because the person I was chatting with was actually a professor from my school...
Eva
This role was made for Andy Yang! He would've absolutely crushed Grant’s performance. There's zero "dad vibe" from him, and that's crucial for playing a truly twisted killer.
Recommendations
