Stalker

Plot
In Andrei Tarkovsky's 1979 science fiction epic "Stalker," the boundaries between reality and desire are blurred, and the fabric of space-time is twisted by the enigmatic Zone. This mysterious region, hidden behind barbed wire and guarded by soldiers, defies the conventional laws of physics, where the rules of cause and effect are fluid, and the concept of time is distorted. The story follows three men: Red (Aleksandr Kaidanovskiy), a wealthy engineer; Vinokourov (Nikolai Grinko), a man consumed by his desire for a new hip; and the Stalker (Anatoli Solonitsyn), a skilled and enigmatic guide who navigates the treacherous terrain of the Zone. The Stalker's role is not that of a traditional guide but rather a confidant, a facilitator who helps his clients explore the depths of their own desires, which are often buried deep within their psyche. As the trio ventures into the Zone, the audience is presented with a desolate, post-apocalyptic landscape, devoid of life and vibrancy. The Zone is a realm where the laws of physics are bent, where gravity seems to warp, and where time is manipulated. The air is thick with an otherworldly energy, and the environment exudes an aura of foreboding, as if the very fabric of reality is on the verge of unraveling. Red, the engineer, is driven by a desire to comprehend the mysteries of the Zone and unlock its secrets. His is a quest for knowledge, a desire to harness the power of the Zone to change the world. Vinokourov, on the other hand, is a man tormented by his own mortality, and his desire for a new hip is a metaphor for his longing for health, renewal, and a return to life. Their desires, though different, are both deeply personal and fundamentally human. The Stalker, with his laconic demeanor and enigmatic smile, embodies the concept of the Zone itself: unknowable, elusive, and yet, paradoxically, intimate. He is the link between the clients and the mysterious realm they seek to explore. His role is both facilitator and confidant, guiding his clients through the treacherous terrain of their own desires and confrontations. Throughout the film, the lines between reality and fantasy blur, and the audience is presented with a world that is both familiar and yet utterly alien. The Zone is a realm where time is fluid, and events unfold in a non-linear fashion, defying the conventional notion of cause and effect. The landscape, too, is a product of this non-linearity, with buildings seeming to shift and change shape, and objects disappearing into thin air. As the three men journey deeper into the Zone, their desires begin to manifest in ways both subtle and profound. Red witnesses a glimpse of a mysterious figure, which symbolizes his longing for connection and understanding. Vinokourov, meanwhile, enters a realm where his desires are realized, though the consequences are far more profound than he had ever imagined. Throughout the film, Tarkovsky's use of long, contemplative takes, combined with his attention to detail and the use of rich, cinematic textures, creates a dreamlike atmosphere, which immerses the viewer in the world of the Zone. The result is a film that is both a profound exploration of human nature and a meditation on the elusiveness of the sublime. "Stalker" is a film that resists easy interpretation, a complex and enigmatic work that rewards multiple viewings and reflection. Its themes of desire, the nature of reality, and the human condition continue to resonate with audiences today, and its influence can be seen in the work of directors such as Christopher Nolan and Denis Villeneuve. Ultimately, "Stalker" is a film that challenges its viewer to confront the depths of their own desires and the complexities of the human experience.
Reviews
Harper
\#Rewatch# 4.5; Teeming with philosophical debates akin to theological inquiries, this can be viewed as Tarkovsky's comprehensive and profound analysis of religion, art, and science (as represented by the three protagonists), perhaps his most deeply personal exploration. One can also glimpse or imagine the ascetic-like conditions of its production. The industrial/nuclear-inflicted erosion of the natural landscape foreshadows its destruction, the precarious state of human faith, and the inability to control emotions - Tarkovsky's ambition here is immense, touching upon the very essence of existence at nearly every turn. Defining this apocalyptic wasteland as "the Zone" positions it not only as a final sanctuary of hope for a holy fool (a saint), but also as a reflection of the innermost depths of the human soul and spirit...
Harmony
A masterfully restored classic, a nihilistic work brimming with metaphors. It can be said to be about nothing, or about everything. From Eisenstein to Tarkovsky and then to Zvyagintsev, Russia/the former USSR has produced so many masters of mise-en-scène. The signature tracking shots in "Stalker" may very well be the greatest in cinematic history...
Amara
Having watched "Stalker" for the first time, a young Bi Gan was more curious than impressed. As the film began to play, he recalled, "I almost threw up the moment I saw it. What the hell is this?" He shut it off with a curse. Yet, the film lingered, becoming a kind of opponent he had to face. Every time he considered watching something else, he felt compelled to finish "Stalker" first. After a long while, he finally managed to see it through. And after some more time, Bi Gan felt like he had finally gained some insights into the art of cinema.
Sylvia
Give Tarkovsky a fetid ditch, and he'll film the history of past civilizations. Give Tarkovsky a glass, and he'll film a vision of the future cosmos. Give Tarkovsky an empty room, and he'll make time dwell in the present. After filming it three or four times, even God didn't want <Stalker> to be finished.
Jace
Tarkovsky, my apologies, I haven't yet reached the aesthetic threshold to fully appreciate this film. I can only hope to revisit it in the future with a more refined ability to discern its merits. While watching, I desperately wished for a commentary track – a snippet of explanation followed by a segment of the film, repeated throughout. Otherwise, I was completely lost as to what the movie was trying to convey. It was just too demanding! Someone said it's harder to chew than a loaf of Russian rye bread, which is a rather apt comparison. Another viewer mentioned that this movie is watched with the soul, while the body is reserved for sleep, and I honestly can't argue with that. The fact that it simultaneously ranks among the IMDB Top 250, the Sight & Sound Critics' Top 100, the Sight & Sound Directors' Top 100, and the TSPDT Top 1... all I can say is, incredible.
Recommendations
